24th Day of Lent: Going without… carers being listened to

Isaac and Rebecca

Rebecca writes:

“Carers of children who develop mental illness cling onto hope – initially, hope for a complete cure. The shock of a child’s personality altered by incurable mental illness, with their future in jeopardy, takes years to understand. Gradually acceptance emerges with the constant hope that the cared for person attains insight into his or her condition and retains equilibrium by being medication compliant.

Under the Trust’s new strategy, people who – sometimes after many years of suffering – have reached this stage are being penalised by not being offered appropriate therapy and support to recover beyond self-medication and self-sufficiency.

The best ever comment to the person I care for from a consultant was, ‘You look so well that if I did not know you were ill, I would not be able to notice that anything is wrong with you.’ That gave me hope. However, this was when the person I care for was receiving regular support and monitoring from the Trust’s Assertive Outreach (AO) teams. Under the new Trust strategy, as a carer I am despondent about the future. People with mental illness live on the edge of their conditions. Crises may happen at any time. Presently crisis teams are also working ‘on the edge’ because there are insufficient beds available for people in crisis.

Surely, there are less vital aspects of the Foundation Trust’s elected distribution of its budget that could be dispensed with? Who made the decision to dismantle the assertive outreach teams? Who is scrutinising how the given budget is distributed between essential services and not being squandered on non-essential initiatives like consultations the results of which are ignored?

Carers acknowledge national moves towards care in the community, but discharging people with inadequate routine care is dangerous. Who is responsible for closing beds before alternatives are available in the community? Who is responsible for dispensing with clinical staff with years of experience at huge expense, with the result that remaining staff are stressed and desperate to provide a safe service without the time to do so? Who decides to close beds and siphon off patients to private nursing homes at twice the cost of the beds they are closing?

Who cares about the carers? At one time we hoped that the Trust was listening to us. Now we know the decision makers are immune to our concerns.”

3 thoughts on “24th Day of Lent: Going without… carers being listened to”

  1. The other aspect of this is the help that is needed by parents who have a serious mental illness. The last national review of the Care Programme Approach ( CPA ) defied certain key groups as a priority for CPA. Top of the list is ” People with a severe mental illness who have parenting responsibilities. ” Being on CPA means you should have an allocated care coordinator, who assesses your needs, devises a care plan in collaboration with you, a risk assessment and a crisis plan. Any help you need with parenting should be included. We are hearing from a number of parents who are being offered nothing from the service, are having personal budgets cancelled or reduced; a care plan should be there to prevent people becoming acutely unwell, so the mental health service should be preventive, not just targetted at people who are currently very unwell.

  2. As the former manager of the City AO team I completely agree with the person posting. Such a waste of money – as an over 50 I was offered early retirement. Like others that did the same, I have a heavy heart about leaving – but the stress was too much, I had become seriously ill, I was not enjoying life. Sleepless nights worrying about how we were going to deliver a half way decent service ground me down. I’ve taken a job as a care assistant to top up my pension – it is a real pleasure to still be able to serve the public, and not have all the worry. I wish my former colleagues well and hope that something happens to ensure a decent service can be resumed!

  3. Sumatra Slim Belly Tonic takes pride in its manufacturing process, ensuring that every batch is produced in FDA-approved and GMP-certified facilities. This means that each and every bottle of Sumatra Slim Belly Tonic meets the highest standards of quality and safety. You can trust that you are getting a product that has undergone strict quality control measures and is backed by scientific research.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top